📝 docs: add XAttention performance analysis documentation

Add comprehensive performance analysis for XAttention:
- NVTX marker locations and usage
- Block size impact on offload mode (4096 vs 1024)
- Detailed timing breakdown for estimate vs compute phases
- softmax_fuse_block_sum_kernel analysis
- Optimization recommendations

Key findings:
- block_size=4096 is 2x faster than 1024 for 64K context
- find_blocks_chunked is bottleneck (40%) at block_size=4096
- estimate_gemm becomes bottleneck (24%) at block_size=1024

Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
via [Happy](https://happy.engineering)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Happy <yesreply@happy.engineering>

CLAUDE.md

@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ Nano-vLLM is a lightweight vLLM implementation (~1,200 lines) for fast offline L
 | [`docs/bench_offload_results.md`](docs/bench_offload_results.md) | 📊 BENCH: CPU offload 性能测试结果，Full vs XAttention 对比 (32K/128K) |
 | [`docs/cpu_offload_optimization_strategies.md`](docs/cpu_offload_optimization_strategies.md) | 🚀 OPT: CPU offload 优化策略：chunk size、CUDA Graph、前沿研究(InfiniGen/ShadowKV) |
 | [`docs/gpu_only_xattn_guide.md`](docs/gpu_only_xattn_guide.md) | 🚀 GPU-Only XAttention: 内存预分配、性能分析 (32K +15%, 64K +41%)、CUDA Graph 限制 |
+| [`docs/xattn_performance_analysis.md`](docs/xattn_performance_analysis.md) | 📊 XAttention 性能分析: NVTX 标记、block size 影响、estimate vs compute 耗时对比 |
 
 ## Rules Index