Zijie Tian 3da9b8aef2 ️ perf: optimize XAttention estimate phase with K-only loading
Add load_k_only_to_slot_layer() to OffloadEngine for estimate phase:
- Only load K (not K+V) during block selection in select_blocks()
- Reduces H2D transfer by 50% in estimate phase
- 64K context: XAttn/Full ratio drops from 1.48x to 0.99x
- 32K context: XAttn/Full ratio drops from 1.67x to 1.20x

The estimate phase uses flat_group_gemm_fuse_reshape(Q, K) which
only requires K for attention score computation. V is unused.

Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
via [Happy](https://happy.engineering)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Happy <yesreply@happy.engineering>
2026-01-28 06:24:20 +08:00
2025-11-04 00:45:10 +08:00
2025-08-31 20:02:51 +08:00
2025-06-10 00:27:01 +08:00
2025-11-04 01:44:42 +08:00
2025-12-26 21:02:43 +08:00

GeeeekExplorer%2Fnano-vllm | Trendshift

Nano-vLLM

A lightweight vLLM implementation built from scratch.

Key Features

  • 🚀 Fast offline inference - Comparable inference speeds to vLLM
  • 📖 Readable codebase - Clean implementation in ~ 1,200 lines of Python code
  • Optimization Suite - Prefix caching, Tensor Parallelism, Torch compilation, CUDA graph, etc.

Installation

pip install git+https://github.com/GeeeekExplorer/nano-vllm.git

Model Download

To download the model weights manually, use the following command:

huggingface-cli download --resume-download Qwen/Qwen3-0.6B \
  --local-dir ~/huggingface/Qwen3-0.6B/ \
  --local-dir-use-symlinks False

Quick Start

See example.py for usage. The API mirrors vLLM's interface with minor differences in the LLM.generate method:

from nanovllm import LLM, SamplingParams
llm = LLM("/YOUR/MODEL/PATH", enforce_eager=True, tensor_parallel_size=1)
sampling_params = SamplingParams(temperature=0.6, max_tokens=256)
prompts = ["Hello, Nano-vLLM."]
outputs = llm.generate(prompts, sampling_params)
outputs[0]["text"]

Benchmark

See bench.py for benchmark.

Test Configuration:

  • Hardware: RTX 4070 Laptop (8GB)
  • Model: Qwen3-0.6B
  • Total Requests: 256 sequences
  • Input Length: Randomly sampled between 1001024 tokens
  • Output Length: Randomly sampled between 1001024 tokens

Performance Results:

Inference Engine Output Tokens Time (s) Throughput (tokens/s)
vLLM 133,966 98.37 1361.84
Nano-vLLM 133,966 93.41 1434.13

Star History

Star History Chart

Description
No description provided
Readme MIT 3 MiB
Languages
Python 96.2%
Shell 2.4%
C++ 1.1%
Cuda 0.3%